Short answer
SKK 1 is the basic standard on which all other national standards are based. It does not regulate a single item such as inventory or leasing. It determines when an item is first recognized in the statements, at what value it is measured, how accounting policies are selected, and what happens when an error from a prior year is discovered.
| Effective version | SKK 1 (2023), effective date January 1, 2025 |
| Who enforces it? | Any entity that prepares financial statements in accordance with GAAP. |
| Voice recognition | Two conditions together: potential benefit and reliable measurement. |
| Measurement base | Historical cost, unless a SKK requires otherwise. |
| Last year's material error | Corrected retrospectively in the comparators. |
| Change in assessment | Only in the moment it happens, never afterward. |
| Continuity Horizon | 12 months from the date of reporting |
Verified on November 8, 2026 by Andi Haxhillari, Certified Accountant. Compared with the text of SKK 1 effective January 1, 2025, paragraphs 1 through 124, and with Law No. 25/2018, Articles 5 and 13.

Read also: Tax calendar: all filing and payment deadlines
Read also: Capital gains tax for 2026, rates of 15% and 23% and thresholds
SKK 1 sets out the principles, concepts, and general rules on which financial statements are built. Its paragraph 1 summarizes four areas: accounting policies, accounting estimates, error correction, and post-period reporting events.
It is the umbrella standard. When another SKK remains silent on an issue, the answer is sought here. Its basis is the 2015 SNRF for small and medium units, primarily sections 2, 10, and 31.
The effective version is dated January 1, 2025 and is applied prospectively, meaning it does not require a revision of prior-year statements.
The standard applies to every set of financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. It has no category of its own and does not differentiate by size.
Which entity applies IFRS and which applies SNRF is not determined by this standard but by Article 5 of Law No. 25/2018. As a rule, IFRS are applied by all entities, while public interest entities apply SNRF.
A single exception is written into the standard. It does not apply to immaterial items, that is, amounts that do not affect the reader's decision regarding the statements.
Recognition requires two conditions simultaneously. Future economic benefit must be feasible, and the cost or value must be reliably measured. If one is missing, the claim is not recognized.
The voice that doesn't meet the conditions today doesn't disappear. It may be recognized at a later time when the conditions are met, or it may only be revealed in the explanatory notes.
Initial measurement is made at historical cost, unless another standard requires a different basis. After initial recognition, tangible long-term assets are carried at amortized cost and inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Non-financial liabilities are measured at the best estimate possible.
Offsetting between assets and liabilities, or between revenues and expenses, is not allowed. The only exceptions are cases where an SKK explicitly requires or permits it.
A company is suing a client for 2,000,000 lek unpaid. The lawyer assesses the likelihood of winning the case as possible, but the amount that will be collected depends on the court's decision and cannot be reliably determined today.
The first condition is met, the second is not. Therefore, the company does not recognize any asset of 2,000,000 lek and does not increase its annual profit. The matter is disclosed in the explanatory notes as a contingent asset.
In the following year, the court rules in favor of the company for 1,400,000 lekë. Now both conditions are met, so the asset is recognized in that year, at 1,400,000 lekë. Last year's comparative figures are not affected, because there was no error, only a lack of reliable measurement.
This is the distinction that generates the most questions in practice, because each is treated differently.
Policy is the choice of a method, for example the way inventories are measured. It is applied consistently from year to year and is changed only when required by an accounting standard or law, or when the new method provides a more objective presentation. The change is applied retrospectively, meaning that comparative figures are also revised, except in cases where a specific standard requires prospective application.
The valuation is an estimated figure, such as the useful life of a device or a provision for doubtful claims. When new information changes that estimate, the effect is recognized only in the period in which the change occurs. Prior-period figures are never affected.
An error is the failure to use or the misuse of information that was available at the time. Material errors from prior periods are corrected retrospectively. Non-material errors are simply corrected in the current period.
The standard divides them into two groups, and the difference is practical, not theoretical.
A regulatory event provides evidence of a condition that existed as of the balance sheet date. It is reflected in the financial statements. The most common example is a client's bankruptcy in February, which proves that the December 31 receivable was uncollectible.
The non-regulatory event relates to a condition that arose after the balance sheet date. It does not affect the figures but is explained in the notes if it is material. A fire in the warehouse in February falls under this.
Dividends declared after the reporting period are not recognized as an obligation of that period. They may be presented as a separate component of retained earnings.
ASC 1 requires eight items. A summary of the principal accounting policies. An explanation of any policy changes. The nature and reasons when an ASC has not been followed. Changes in accounting estimates. Material misstatements corrected. The date the authorization for publication was granted and who granted it. Material non-adjusting events. And any material uncertainty about the going concern of operations.
The first mistake is treating every adjustment as a prior-year error. Most cases are valuation changes and go into the current year without affecting the comparables.
The second mistake is recognizing a revenue solely because the gain seems possible. Without reliable measurements, the entry goes to the notes, not to the statements.
The third mistake is adjusting the figures. Subtracting expenses from revenues right at the outset hides the real volume of activity and makes comparison with the previous year impossible.
The fourth mistake is changing the method from year to year without reason. The standard only allows it when the new method provides a more objective presentation, and requires that the change be explained.
The fifth mistake is formalism. The standard places economic substance above legal form. A lease that on paper is called ordinary but that in essence transfers the risks and rewards to the lessee is treated according to its substance.
The micronode applies SKK 15, which is a standalone standard with simpler rules. However, the basic concepts of recognition and measurement are the same, and when SKK 15 is silent, clarification must be sought in the other standards.
Materiality is the voice that, if omitted or misrepresented, affects the economic decisions of the readers of financial statements. It is measured both by quantity and by nature. A small amount can be material if it relates to management or to a related party.
Only when a change is required by a standard or by law, or when the new method provides a more objective presentation. The change is applied retrospectively and explained in the notes. Changes made to improve the appearance of the results are not permitted.
If the error is material, yes, it is corrected retrospectively and the comparative figures are revised. If it is immaterial, it is simply corrected in the current year. In both cases, previously filed statements are not replaced; the correction is shown in the new statements.
The standard requires that the notes include the date of authorization and who issued it. According to Article 23 of Law No. 25/2018, the financial statements are signed by the unit's legal representative and by the person responsible for their preparation.
Financial statements are prepared on the assumption that the business will continue as a going concern. The standard sets the evaluation horizon at 12 months from the reporting date. When there is material uncertainty, it is disclosed in the notes.
No. The standard text does not provide numerical examples; its examples are descriptive. The above example is our illustration of its rules.
SSAP 1 “The General Framework for the Preparation of Financial Statements,” version effective January 1, 2025, adopted by the National Council of Accountancy.
Law No. 25/2018 “On Accounting and Financial Statements,” Article 5 on the applicable standard and Article 13 on the components of the financial statements. The law was amended by Law No. 87/2026, published in the Official Gazette No. 176, dated August 7, 2026.
The official text of the standard is available on the National Accounting Council's website, in the standards section effective January 1, 2025.
AlProfit Consult maintains accounts in accordance with applicable standards, documents accounting policies, and corrects errors as needed as part of the monthly subscription.
